No
divinity
excepted(except) Allah the very High. That the best greetings
are on the seers and the divine messengers of whom the Seal of the
Prediction.
In the Bible,
he (it) is
not written :
18
Now,
the birth of Jesus Christ so arrived: Marie, her mother, having been
betrothed to Joseph, was encircled with the Holy Spirit, before they
have a relation together. 19 Then Joseph, her husband, being a
man of property, and not wanting to expose (explain) him (it)
publicly, wanted to send back (to dismiss) her (it) secretly. 20
But as he thought of it, Here we are, an angel of the Lord appeared
to him(her) there dream, and says to him (her) : Joseph, son
(sons,thread) of David, be not afraid of taking Marie for your wife
; because what was conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit ; 21 And
she (it) will give birth to a son, and kept
silent will give him(her) the name of JESUS (YAHWEH or the Eternal the
Rescuer) ; because
it is him who will save his(her) people of their sins. Ésaie 9: 5; 33: 22;
63: 16. 22 Now, all
this arrived, so that what accomplît
what the Lord had said in these terms by the seer: 23 Here we
are, the virgin will be pregnant, and she will give birth to a son,
and we shall name him EMMANUEL, what means: GOD WITH US. 24 When
Joseph was woken by his sleep, he made as the angel of the Lord he
had commanded (ordered), and he took his wife. 25 But he (it) did
not know her (it) until she had given birth to her son first-born,
and he (it) gave him (her) the name of JESUS. (Bible. Matthieu). 26
Now, in
the sixth month, God sent the angel Gabriel to a city of
Galilee, 27 called Nazareth, to a
virgin betrothed to a man named Joseph, of David's house; and this
virgin was called Marie. 28 And the angel having entered with
her, says to him (her): I greet you, you who were
largely favored; the Lord is with you; you are
blessed between the women. 29 And having seen the angel,
she (it) was disturbed by her(its) speech, and she thought in herself
of the fact that could be this greeting. 30 Then the angel says
to him (her): Marie, be not afraid, because you were favored in front
of God. 31 And you will conceive and you will give birth to a
son, and you will call his(her,its) name JESUS. 32 He will be
big, and will be called Son of the Almighty, and the Lord God will
give him (her) David's throne his father. 33 He (It) will reign
eternally over Jacob's house, and there will be no end in the
administration. 34 Then Marie says to the angel: how will it be
made, because I do not know a man? 35 And the angel answered
him(her): the Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the
Almighty will cover you with its shadow; that is why also the holy
child who will arise from you will be called the Son
of God. (Luc. The Bible of the Sword).
18. Here is
how arrived the birth of Jesus Christ. Marie, her mother, having
been betrothed to Joseph, was pregnant, by the virtue of the Holy
Spirit, before they had lived together. 19
Joseph, her husband, who was a man of property and who did not want
to slander her(it), suggested breaking secretly with
her. 20 As he thought of it, Here we are, an angel of
the Lord appeared to him(her) there dream, and says: Joseph,
son(sons,thread) of David, be not afraid of taking with you Marie,
your wife, because the child whom she (it) conceived comes from the
Holy Spirit; 21 she (it) will give birth to a son, and kept
silent will give him(her) the name of Jesus; it is him who will save
his(her) people of his (her) sins. (LSg-Mt:1:18-20)
31 And
Here we are, you will become pregnant, and you will give birth to a
son, and kept silent will give him (her) the name of Jesus. (LSg – Luc:1:31).
The
biblical word: messiah or the Messiah.
This study on
the word "Messiah" includes several shutters (sectors) : 1°) the Messiah himself. Fiction or
historic reality. For the traditionel
Islam no doubt. (V. The Koran). 2°) His (Her) personality
and her place in the History of the Sons (Threads) of Israel.
(Idem). 3°) Herald of the coming of the Seer
waited in Writings. It is what we go to see (visit) and to develop.
Possible senses (directions) of messiah's name according to the
biblical world.
People
of the Bible. Shape hellenized by the Hebrew Maskîak:
« anointed ». In N.T., almost
always the Greek while corresponding word Christos (= « anointed ») who
is used[5]. 1. The oil of unction and
its employments (uses). (Compare : Thora. Exodus. 30, 22-23). 2. Samuel anoints
David, the seer, to make future king of Israel, in Bethlehem. (1
Samuel 16, 12-13 ). 3. We said that people of the Synagogue
indicated (appointed) of messiah's name or Anointed
(translated into Greek by Christ) the providential agent of
"gesture" of Yahweh, waited
for when God would intervene and would realize the installation of
his administration or realm on earth (ground). The biblical Writings,
indeed, represented him (it), as it is said, as a divine messenger,
sanctified and dedicated by an unction similar to the one that had
received kings of Israel and which marked the priests.
This
future Messiah had to be a descendant of king David and
conqueror as his ancestor (such was not the case of the son of
Marie), a seer (people of the Gospel, in their great majority,
refuse to see in the son of Marie, a seer of God and Israel and a
conqueror) and a doctor, a learned man, who would teach the people
of regenerated and cleansed Israel, a thaumaturge which would carry out any sorts
of miracles. Certain prophetic oracles had spoken about a humbled
and unwell Messiah, but the doctors had held (retained)
nothing of this announcement, either they applied to others than to
messianic king texts relative to the sufferings of the Messiah,
not imagining the national hero that glory, power and dominion.
In Talmud, we read: the rabbis say
: as for king Messie, that he (it) was a part of alive or of
deaths, he will name David (that is, that he already exists or not,
he will be of royal tree stump). Here we are, according to R. Tanhouma, the motive. He (it) remits,
it is said, in anointed sound, to David (Psaume XVIII, 51).
R. Ben-Lévi said Josué will be called
Cemah; according to R.
Judan. b.
R. Aïbo, his(her,its) name will be
Menahem ( comforter) ( comforter). R. Son of
Abahou Hanina, says: you should
not believe that the opinion of the one contradicts that of the
other one, because at the bottom(really) these names are the same.
(Treated (handled) with Berakhoth. Chap. II. p.
41).
(...) A textual verse
of the Bible confirms it: Lebanon is (Isaïe, X, 34), will fall with
majesty; and these words are followed by these: one
branch will go out of the tree stump of Isaïe (that is, the destruction of the
temple will be compensated with the birth of a Messiah coming down
(falling) from David). (Op..
quoted p. 42).
A Messiah,
according to this word, was to wait thus, but only after the
destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem. It had to take place after
the rise of the Messiah, Ichoua the son
of Marie (on him the Peace !). He will thus be The messiah, this
expected seer. He (it) will compensate for the loss of Salomon's
Temple (Suleiman). It will be the descent of Ismaël and not the descent of Isaac ( Ishaq)
as always hope for it certain people of the Sons (Threads) of Israel
and the talmudic education.
And also
:
Always
in the same sense (direction) : unction. (The oil
of). 1. We read in Talmud : the one
who reigns for the first time (the founder of a dynasty) must be
dedicated by the oil of unction, not the son of king. So, he (it) is
said (I Sam. XVI., 12) : get up, anoint him (it) ; it is
him, that is this one needs to be anointed, not his (her) sons
(threads), whereas all the series of the pontiffs, there were
ten generations, is necessary undergo individually the ceremony of
the unction, and the rest of the flask of oil will be kept
(preserved) for the future world, according to these words
(Exodus, XXX, 31) : this oil of holy unction will belong to
me for all your generations. We shall dedicate kings with a
source, as he (it) is said (I Rois, I, 33) : you will make my
son Salomon rise on my she-mule and will make him come down (fall)
towards the river Guihon, where the cohen Zadoq will
anoint him (it), the seer so proclaiming king on Israel. We
anoint as such the son of king no as in case of contesting. And so
Salomon was anointed, because Adonias
disputed him (her) the throne; or Joas because of Athalie Jéhu,
because of Joram. How is it possible
towards this last one, because we deduct from the (aforesaid) verse,
« get up, anoint him (it) ; because it is him », that
only he must be anointed, not kings of Israel (as was him (her) Jéhu) ? Indeed, it is necessary to erase
what was said about Jéhu, and to
substitute him(her) the example of Joahaz anointed because of his (her) elder
brother Joakim, more 2-year-old. But how were we able to anoint this
last one? Already Josias had not buried the oil ? It's
true, and we meant that Joahaz was
anointed by a new composition (balsamon
).
To
anoint kings, we use (employ) a special horn. So, Saul and Jéhu, anointed by the oil of a small jug, had
only a short-lived administration; whereas David and Salomon,
anointed by the horn, had long-term administrations. If the pontiffs
become kings, we do not anoint them (this coronation being special
to David's family). It is, says R. Juda d'Antodria, because he (it)
is written (Genesis, XLIX, 10): the spectre will not leave
Juda. We deduct him (it), according to R. Hiya b. Ada, of
what it is said (Deutéron, XVII, 18) : so that he prolongs
his (its) administration, him and
his sons (threads), in the middle of Israel ; and these words
are followed by this sentence : he (it) (the
administration) will not fall to cohanim, nor to lévites. R. Yohanan says that 2 names of Johanan and Yoahaz (in the succession of Kings) relate to
the same individual. But he (it) is not said (I Chrn., III,
15): the elder son (brother) (sons (threads) of Josias)
was Johanan ? (How thus were
we able to say higher that Joakim was 2
years old more ?) he was the elder son (brother) for the
administration (he reigned the first one). R. Yohanan said as well as Schalom and
Sédecias was the names of a single man.
But he (it) is not said (ibid ).: 3Ème Son (of Josias) was Sédecias and 4Ème Schalom ? We mean that there were
3Ème In order of the
births, and 4Ème By row
(rank) of administration. It was named Sédécias (God's justice) because the divine
justice dwelt on him (under Nabuchodonosor) ; and Schalom ( suit), because of his (her,its) time
the dynasty of David's family was completed. According to R. Simon
b. Lakisch, he (it) did not carry
(wear)
either the name of Schalom, or that of
Sédécias, but that of Matnia; so, is said (II Kings, XXIV, 17)
: king of Babylon made his uncle Matnia reign on his
place and changed his name in that of Sédécias. » (Treated (handled) Scheqalim. P. 300/301). 2. We dedicate
kings with a source, » We shall thus notice that those who
drafted gospel, dedicated the son of Marie (son
presumed of divine Creator) near a current of water, in this
particular case the Jordan.
Reserved in : according to the world of Thora, famous biblical persons as David,
Salomon, his(her) son, Ichoua (on them
the Peace!), etc., could not be at the same moment seers of the
Saint and Lord of Israel, and the kings in Israel[6]. The example of the son of
Marie is there to call back(to remind) it to us. On no account, for
people of the Synagogue, he could be a seer of the Saint and Lord of
Israel and the king in Israel. Moreover, himself (itself) fuiera this function(office). 3. We anoint
such the son of king no as in case of contesting. In the Koran,
their Lord did not reveal, against them, that the Sons(Threads) of
Israel asked after Mochè (on him the
Peace!), king to their seer of time, so that they can fight(dispute)
in the path of God[7]. ( The Koran II 246-252 ).
This king will be of Benjamin's Tribe. Originally, the prediction
returned to the Jacob's Lévi son's tribe on which depended the
seers Mochè and Aaron ( Haroun) (on them the Peace !). The monarchy
(kingship) in Juda's Tribe son (sons,thread) of Jacob on whom
depended David and Salomon (on them the Peace !). We said that
Benjamin's Tribe had committed a big sin. Among their bad habits,
they coupled, in full street, the day, with the women. God (excited
him (it) is!) made lower (go down,fall) then on them His
(Her,Its)
anger, and deprived of them: the prediction and the
monarchy (kingship). We called them then the Tribe[8] of the Sin.
And still :
According to Gérard Israël in " The Christian question
": « Paul Christiani[9]
calls back (reminds) a midrachique
education according to which one (which) the Messiah arrived in the
daytime of the destruction of the Temple (in 70). Nahmanide answers that Jesus, at this moment,
had died for forty years, and that even in the hypothesis advanced
(moved) by his interlocutor he could not be the Messiah[10] … The sense (direction) of
the midrach is quite other. It is not
said that the Messiah came this New Year's Day 70 but that he
was born this day... He (it) will show itself only when the time
comes, at the convenient moment, and it was not the case yet.
Furthermore,
adds the Rabbi, in none of the texts of the Jewish tradition it is
said that « the Messiah was put to death by his enemies[11]. You will not find to the
world, whatever book (pound) it is of the tradition of Israel, in
Talmud[12] or Agadot [theoretical education], that the Messiah son of David[13] will be put to death neither
that it will be put back (handed) in the hands of his enemies nor
that he (it) will be buried among the criminals [...]. The Messiah such
as you him (her,it) appropriated[14], it is not question to
bury him (it)[15] ». In brief, the Messiah
is maybe already born, but he did not come : his (her,its)
administration is not happened.
We ask then
Nahmanide: because the Messiah was
born, where is he ? The answer is double: maybe he (it) is near Rome,
among the unfortunates oppressed by the Roman power, either more
certainly he (it) is in the garden of Eden, the place where lived
(lay) Adam, the protypical man, because the Messiah is a
man[16].
When the
Messiah will have come, Adam's fault will be cancelled[17], and consequently the
penalties which struck him (it). Now today the man continues to earn
the bread in the sweat of the forehead (front), the woman to give
birth in the pain, and both return to the dust after their
death(dead man), what proves well that the Messiah did not another
come[18].
The main
characteristic of the Messiah, underlines Nahmanide, is to reign. He owes « to dominate
from the sea to the sea and of the river until the borders of the
earth (ground) [19] » as says it the psalm[20]. Now Jesus has never
reigned, and consequently he has never saved or protected his people[21]. Jesus did not protect his
own life, how would he have been able to protect Israel? The Messiah
will come in the glory and when he will die, because he is a man, he
will bequeath his crown to his son[22]! The Messiah thus has to
reign[23] over all the peoples[24]. In particular he has to
collect the exiles of Israel[25]. Now of the time of Jesus,
the dispersal consecutive to the destruction of the Temple had not
occurred yet. « King-messiah[26] is intended to get up for
Israel[27], to reconstruct the Temple
and to collect the exiles of Israel », declares Nahmanide. The truth is that as long as
Israel will be subjected to the powers, the messianic era cannot
happen[28].
Finally,
Paul Christiani approaches the thorough question: « do you Believe
that the Messiah about whom speak the seers is a man absolutely,
arisen from a man and from a woman, either that he is really a God ?
» At first, answers the Rabbi, « the Messiah did not come at this
very moment. The question does not
settle (arise) to know if he is a God or a man. What is sure, it is
that the Messiah who will come will be a man absolutely, a
son of man and a woman, stemming from a coupling up between them, as
I am one myself. He (it) will be of the lineage of David and his
(its)
descent ». Nahmanide ends on this point: « II is evident
that the Messiah is not at all a divinity and that Jesus is on no
account the Messiah. » When Adam and Eve ate
some fruit of the tree of the knowledge of the Good and the Evil, they did not become a God;
they became as God, knowing simply the Good and the Evil. The men(people) are as God
(in his image); no man can be a God.
In its paper
telling the quarrel of Barcelona, Nahmanide complains not to have been able to
comment on the chapters LII and LIII of the book of the seer Isaïe.
He (it) thus exposes (explains) his (its) analysis of these texts,
generally presented by the Christians as the packaging in germ the
messianité of Jesus : the Messiah is a
man who is situated over the angels. The simple fact of believing in
its coming allows to acquire the " intelligence of the faith", that
is the knowledge of the convenient moment which he (it) will
choose to show itself to the men (people). He (it) will collect them,
not by her power (politics) ((policy)) but by the only " effect of
his(its) breath". The Messiah as the man
will rise above of the Abraham and Moses
and, announces the seer Daniel, « he will rise by his
intelligence and he will understand supremely the Name, blessed
he is; he will rise and will be excited outside by the
knowledge of his Name ». So « the Messiah will see a descent
[...] He (It) will rise and his(its) administration will rise among the
peoples and the powerful
realms will be his (her,its) booty ».
Nahmanide so describes the messianic era in
the only concern to expose(explain) the traditional conception that
the Judaism is made of the Rescuer. But he (it) goes farther and
resumes, on a sharply
polemical plan, the common (current)
arguments going against the Christian conceptions. Addressing king,
he exclaims: « you, our Lord, king, you are Christian, son
(sons,thread) of a Christian and a Christian ; all your life you
heard (understood) priests, monks and moralizers to speak about the
knowledge of Jesus. They filled your brains with it and the marrow
of your bones. Until the custom leads (drives) your spirit to believe
in it. Nevertheless, what of what you have the faith and which is
the essence of your faith, the common sense would not know how to
accept him (it) [...]. That the creator of heavens and earth
(ground) as
well as all that they contain, penetrates into the stomach of a
Jewish woman and lingers there nine months, give birth to a small,
that he grows and is then delivered to the hands of his enemies who
condemn him (it) for death (dead man) and kill him (it) and what
finally, according to your statements, he (it) resuscitates and turns
around in his (its) initial place, it is unbearable in the spirit of
the Jews as every man[39] ! »
That a
boss of the tradition, in the fire of the debate, has appeal to
arguments of "common sense" can surprise.
Really,
in the analysis of Nahmanide everything
leads (drives) to this idea that « the wise person takes
him (it) on the Seer ». It's better to try to
know the Name of God rather than to augur. The prediction, indeed, is other than a "
particular experience (experiment) of the senses (directions) and the
imaginative faculty (power) which allows, in certain conditions, to
see, to hear (understand), and in a general way to perceive
(collect)
a reality of which the exclusive use of the intellectual faculties
(powers) does not manage to discover ». The reason of the wise
person is there to correct the errors of interpretation of the
prediction. Nahmanide saw in the Christianity a prophétisme (maybe only partially) soiled by
error, and in the Jewish tradition this faculty (power) to raise , thanks to the custom
(usage) of the rational knowledge, the true road of the
knowledge of the Name … (Op..
cit.)
The
messiah or the Seer of the biblical predictions.
According to Biblistes: on the basis of
Thora (Bible. Dt 18:15), the Sons (Threads) of
Israel, the Judaized waited for The messiah (or The messiya) as a sort again Moses (the Seer
par excellence, cf. Nb 12 7 and sv.) Which(Who) would notably renew in
increase a hundredfold the miracles of the Exodus. (Cf. I 3 14; 6 14, 30-31, 58;
7 40, 52; 13 1; Act. 3
22-23; 7 20-44; He 3 1-11;
Mt. 16 14). He would also
be the man of long-awaited Return. Had not they been expelled from
their earth(ground)? Deported? As for the son of Marie,
" seer's " title was never claimed by him in the former
(old) Writings that in a indirect and hoarse way. (Mt. 13 57 ; Lc. 13 33), but that the crowds
clearly looked to him(her), Mt 16 14; 21
11, 46; Mc. 6 15; Lc. 7 16, 39; 24 19; I. 4
19; 9 17), a messianic value had. It is in Ichoua, the alone son of Marie that the faith
of people of the Gospel recognized this Seer, Act. 3 22-26 ; I 6 14 ; 7 40.
However, as it is said, the charisma of prediction having spread in
the primitive Church following the Pentecost,
Act. 11 27, this title of the
son of Marie soon faded in front of other more specific titles of
the Christology.
Also:
the wait (expectation) of the Messiah was big in Israel in the days
when appeared Jesus : gospel testify abundantly of the fervour of
this hope, nevertheless disappointed so often in past. She (it) shows
through in the question put to Jean-Baptist: « whom are you ? » (Jo. 1 19-22), in the reflection of the
Samaritan : « I know that the Messiah is going to come »
(Jo 4 25), in the message of Jean-Baptist to Jesus : « are you
the one who comes, or we have to expect for the other one from it ? » (Lc 7 19), in
the run-up of the enthusiastic crowd which wants to proclaim the
thaumaturge king of Israel (Jo 6 15), in the impatient
remark at the address of the Rescuer : « if you are the Messiah,
say it we openly (frankly) » (Jo 10 24), in the popular cheers
in the day of the triumphant entrance (entry) to Jerusalem:
« hosanna! Blessed the one is who comes in
the name of the Lord ! Blessed is the administration which
arrives from our father David ! » (Mc 11
9-10), etc. The
Sons (Threads) of Israel waited all for the "Seer", who was
named (appointed), in araméenne
language : my ( s ) iya, that is the Seer = Mohammad (Bible. I. 1 21). Not to
confuse (not merge) with My ( s ) ie
Sons (Threads) of Israel, that is the Messiah, Marie's Ichoua son (on him
the Peace !). (To follow).
The Creator of heavens and earth(ground) is thus the only and real
divinity which we like and which we owe like really.
In Arabic language, Allah. In
Hebrew, ïl. Divine name, he(it)
is usually employed for people of the Gospel of Arabic language. In
French, the term God is generally included, not as a divine
Name, but rather as meaning Etre-Suprême, Creator and Boss of the
Universe.
Formulae of eulogies as: that God asks
on him, approves him(her,it), made him(her) mercy, etc., formulae
appropriate(clean) for the traditional Islam. The exegetes
interpret the "prayer" divine as being a granting of Its
mercy and the "prayer" angelic as a demand of forgiveness
for creatures.
Or: Ahmad-Mohammad, son(sons,thread) of
Abd Allah, (...) Son(sons,thread) of Ismaël, son(sons,thread) of
Abraham (on them the Peace!). For the traditional Islam, it is
the Seal of the Prediction, the Seal of the seers and the divine
messengers.
Dic. Illustrated with the Bible.
Edict. Lined. For us, we prefer, in our study, always to use(employ)
the word: messiah or the Messiah. And leave with people of the
Gospel, word: Christ or Christ. 2. Origène, C. Celse, I, 57; VI, 15; in
Joannem, XIII, 27, a samaritain Messiah present Dosithée as who would have appeared after
Jesus and at the same time as Simon; of same Hégésipe, in Eusèbe, IV, 22, 5. In Apocrypha clémentins (Homilies, II, 23 s;
Gratitudes(Recognitions), I, 54; II, 8 s), Dosithée would have been a follower of
Jean-Baptist and would have succeeded him(her) as leader of the sect
based by this one, but he(it) would soon have been supplanted by
Simon. (Note, p. 371. The Birth of the Christianity. Alfred
Loisy. Edict. E. Nourry. 1933.)
According to Rachi: « from David,
it is Exilarques which will
command(order) the people with their spectre. Because they will be
named(appointed) by king. » According to E. Munk (Bible. Gén. 49:10): «... What, on the other
hand, can seem dubatif, it is the reach
of the Very patriarch wanted to look to his(her,its) sentence. Was
it about a preview of the future evolution or about an imperative
order which established Juda's tribe in " royal tribe
" with the exception of the other tribes? This opinion is that
of Maïmoune (...) And of Nahmanide, for whoever the sovereign power of
kings stemming from another tribe that of the Juda represents an
illicit act of appropriation. So this sovereign power was generally
only of a temporary reach. Such was the case of the dynasty of Hasmonéens, descendants of the Lévites, whose
administration collapsed in the dishonor at the end of some
generations. (She(it) had made guilty, besides, of the
accumulation of the priestly and royal fonctionc, what is against the law
expressed to Nbr. XVIII,
7). But R. Nissim of
Gerondi object that if the words of the
Patriarch equivalent to a command, it would be necessary to admit
that all kings of the realm of Israel were usurping, and that, on
the other hand, his(her,its) order was executed never completely so
as the time of David and Salomon who reigned over twelve Tribes. So
he concludes that these words have the character either of a prophètie or a blessing which relates to a
time of national sovereign power (what questions hasmonéens kings) and which envisages only
the historic period « from David » (cf. Rachi), that
is from Juda's administration (what puts the administration of out
of reach Saul). Henceforth, the spectre will never escape completely
Juda (...). Tossaphites considers that
our sentence has the meaning of a blessing (Yoma, 26 a) whose effect had only however
partially reached(affected) because of the unworthiness of certain
representatives of the davidienne
lineage (II Sam. 7)... »
Make the "holy war".
Sabt or asbât = (in Arabic à): qabilah, qabâïl. For other peoples, in religious
language, we shall speak about nations. These nations which waited
for the Seer of nations, Sons(Threads) D' Ismaël and Sons(Threads)
of Israel …
« He(it) was not the same in Barcelona there, where king
Jacques Ier of Aragon summoned(convened) the most illustrious of the
learned Jews of his(her,its) time, Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, said
Nahmanide, to explain in front of a
Dominican, an apostate of the Judaism, Paul Christiani, also very
expert in talmudic knowledge, over the fundamental question to know
which of both religions was authentically situated in the biblical
tradition. » (Op.. cit). Allusion: the
expected seer … The Forgery-messiah will
be killed by the son of Marie, towards the end of times. Book worshipped by the
rabbis, rav and the wise men, people of
the Synagogue. Of any time, people of
the Synagogue defend(forbid) this obsession of a Messiah
son(sons,thread) of David. Now if Messiah he has to come of our
time, he can involve, for them, only the Forgery-messiah. The one
who will bring them all in holy Earth for a final fight with the
Messiah son(sons,thread) of Marie, Mahdi and their troops … We know all that the one
who will die, will be, really, only the resemblance of the son of
Marie. Nahmanide, The Quarrel of Barcelona
(introduction of the translator Eric Smilevitch), Lagrasse, Greenfinch, on 1996, followed by a
comment of Nahmanide Smilevitch), Lagrasse, Greenfinch, on 1996, followed by a
comment of Nahmanide on Isaïe LII and
LIII. By no means. It has been a long time
since this last one is cancelled. It will not be its role. The faiths of people of
the Bible although different remain close one of the other
one. Only the Seer Mohammad
will be able to realize this prediction. Ibidem. Allusion: the people
of Israel. By no means. To reign here has
no same sense(direction) as to us. In the rabbinical spirit, the
divine Paradise is the exclusive property of people Judaized. And
the Messiah to come will have to come only for them, people of the
Torah. Other peoples are concerned, but in the second degree. They
will be under the "dominion" of the society people toranique. What the traditionel Islam throws back(rejects). Allusion: he will be
the Seer of nations. Only the Forgery-messiah
will make him(it). This one who(which) will fight(dispute) the
Messiah son(sons,thread) of Marie and whom(which) left the Judaized
will follow at his(her,its) time and the hour … Who for people of the
Synagogue cannot be divine seer and a king. Exclusively. What is false and pure
claim. It would be important to
know which one(which). The first one: the Messiah son of Marie
came and has to return. The second: the messiah or the expected
seer came in the person of the seer Mohammad. The third: the
Forgery-messiah is expected from all among which by the society
people toranique, in particular. And
before the end of times, the Forgery-messiah will face the Messiah
son(sons,thread) of Marie. Without this case, he can
involve only the Forgery-messiah. Let be the seer waited by
nations. We shall say while they
ate of « the tree of the Predetermination of the good and the
evil ». It belongs to the private
domain: in things created only. By no means to God, because the
"evil" cannot reach(affect) Him(It). The anthropophormisme, the corporalisme (God represented under the shape
of a spiritual "body"), the pantheism are things very
developed at a lot of people of the Torah. How much the Saint and
Lord of Israel and the worlds is over what they describe and
associate to Him(Her)! It belongs to the Messiah
son(sons,thread) of Marie. It is about the Seer
Mohammad only. Daniel X. It is always about the
Seer Mohammad only. Judaism and
Islam defend(forbid) the same points of view. That the traditionel Islam throws back(rejects)
categorically. Talmud, treated(handled) Baba Batra
12A. This Name is
granted(tuned), by divine Creator, that to certain persons of
His(Her) slaves. It is the essential concern of continent toranique. Nevertheless to know him(it) or to
discover him(it), then to use(employ) him(it) mindlessly, can bring
no good to the holder. According to the toranique world the Messiah son of Marie
would have deceived and seduced Israel! And all this, through
the unspeakable Name! Of any time, in any time, society people
toranique did not claim to hold(detain)
the unspeakable name! What is false in a case
as in the other one. False and erroneous
interpretation. As writes it Henri Altan
in his article « Maïmonide and Nahmanide,
rationalism and theology », The New Exercise books, 118,
autumn, 1994. It would not know how to
be. Raise the religion made
tortuous by people of the Bible, here is the role which will
be given to the seer Mohammad, and not to the wise men of
Israel. The philosophy, the free
arbitrator, etc., was always privileged to Prophètie at people of the Synagogue. The
Saint and Lord of Israel and the worlds was never brought up to a
good many of them, taken in value. The spirit of contesting perms
being of rule(ruler) … Would not you rather
should speak of lÉglise of
Paul? Church in direct opposition with Twelve? One of the names of the
Seer Mohammad. Defined article joins to
the word my ( s ) iya. Almessiya. Here the Messiah is going to
appear as being the Seal of the Prediction. 2. In Bible. Jean 1 41,
we find, transcribes of the Hebrew, Méssias was followed by this
explanation: « what translates, mean Christ », equal
(Bible. Jn. 4 25). This person is
The messiah (or The Messiah) whom the Jews called The seer
and whom they waited for the end of times according to the Bible.
Act Deut
18 15 (. 3 22-23; 7 37): I. 1 21; 6 14; 7 40.
Here, and to differentiate him(it) with the Messiah, the
son(sons,thread) of Marie, it is necessary to transcribe him(it)
so: the messiah (or The Messiah), that is the Seer expected and
announced in Writings. Thus, the son of Marie is not Méssias. And this, contrary in claimed
people of the Gospel. Other possible
sense(direction) of the word messiah: beautiful of face,
Blessed (to compare: Mc. 11:10;
Lc.
1:32-33). |